Intolerant Seattle Pro-Choicers at UW vs. Abby Johnson

What?  Excerpts:

A divisive Thursday night lecture on the subject of reproductive rights brought both sides of the issue to the University of Washington, and some attendees ended their night with a trip to the police station.

On a college campus were [sic] writing is a requirement and lively debate is the norm, it's not surprising that Thursday's visit from Abby Johnson created controversy...

See, now, when I hear "controversial pro-life speaker" and "divisive lecture,"  I think of Randall Terry or possibly, I dunno, someone who's going to start pulling out aborted baby pictures. But Abby Johnson?  Really?  One of the sweetest, gentlest speakers you're ever going to hear?

I think this says a lot more about the intolerance of Seattle pro-choicers than it does about the "divisive" nature of what Abby's saying.

I would imagine that if she'd said at UW what she said at FUS, there would perhaps justifiably have been fireworks.  But again--this is the woman who emphasizes the humanity and the good intentions of people who are pro-choice, who worked at an abortion clinic for years and speaks well of her former coworkers, who's had abortions herself ....I mean, honestly?  If you guys are seriously pro-choice, pro-woman, and pro-tolerance, this is the sort of person whom you really have to treat respectfully or else you massively discredit yourselves.

By the way--KOMO 4 misspells "where" right before mentioning that "writing is a requirement" at UW...and what the heck does a writing requirement have to do with people interrupting a speaker?  Why don't they write letters to the editor instead of breaking every semblance of actually being at a university where conflicting viewpoints are welcome and actual dialogue can occur?