UPDATE: Some necessary substantiation here. See also this consideration of ending ectopic pregnancies and the principle of double effect. Excerpts:
It is absolutely true that the Catholic Church bans direct
abortion to save the life of the mother. However (and this is an
extremely important point) the mother's life may be saved by a surgical
procedure that does not directly attack the preborn baby's life.
The most common dysfunctions that may set a mother's life against
that of her preborn child's are the ectopic pregnancy, carcinoma of the
uterine cervix, and cancer of the ovary. Occasionally, cancer of the
vulva or vagina may indicate surgical intervention.
In
such cases, under the principle of the "double effect," attending
physicians must do everything in their power to save both the mother and
the child. If the physicians decide that, in the case of an ectopic
pregnancy, the mother's life can only be saved by the removal of the
Fallopian tube (and with it, the preborn baby), or by removal of some
other tissue essential for the preborn baby's life, the baby will of
course die. But this kind of surgery would not be categorized as an
abortion. This is all the difference between deliberate murder
(abortion) and unintentional natural death.
2 comments:
Chestertonfan
said...
So, they must not consider procedures to end ectopic pregnancies abortions?
It is absolutely true that the Catholic Church bans direct abortion to save the life of the mother. However (and this is an extremely important point) the mother's life may be saved by a surgical procedure that does not directly attack the preborn baby's life.
The most common dysfunctions that may set a mother's life against that of her preborn child's are the ectopic pregnancy, carcinoma of the uterine cervix, and cancer of the ovary. Occasionally, cancer of the vulva or vagina may indicate surgical intervention.
In such cases, under the principle of the "double effect," attending physicians must do everything in their power to save both the mother and the child. If the physicians decide that, in the case of an ectopic pregnancy, the mother's life can only be saved by the removal of the Fallopian tube (and with it, the preborn baby), or by removal of some other tissue essential for the preborn baby's life, the baby will of course die. But this kind of surgery would not be categorized as an abortion. This is all the difference between deliberate murder (abortion) and unintentional natural death.
2 comments:
So, they must not consider procedures to end ectopic pregnancies abortions?
I think not.
http://www.hli.org/index.php/cloning/400?task=view
It is absolutely true that the Catholic Church bans direct abortion to save the life of the mother. However (and this is an extremely important point) the mother's life may be saved by a surgical procedure that does not directly attack the preborn baby's life.
The most common dysfunctions that may set a mother's life against that of her preborn child's are the ectopic pregnancy, carcinoma of the uterine cervix, and cancer of the ovary. Occasionally, cancer of the vulva or vagina may indicate surgical intervention.
In such cases, under the principle of the "double effect," attending physicians must do everything in their power to save both the mother and the child. If the physicians decide that, in the case of an ectopic pregnancy, the mother's life can only be saved by the removal of the Fallopian tube (and with it, the preborn baby), or by removal of some other tissue essential for the preborn baby's life, the baby will of course die. But this kind of surgery would not be categorized as an abortion. This is all the difference between deliberate murder (abortion) and unintentional natural death.
Post a Comment