Something very sobering and terrible is sinking in for Western journalists who are covering the uprising in the Middle East. They are beginning to wonder if the outcomes of these revolutions will automatically be good or, at least, “good” as defined in terms of civil liberties and human rights as they are promoted at, let’s say, the United Nations. In other words, sadly, there may be isolated situations on this earth in which totalitarian governments do a better job of protecting the rights of religious and ethnic minorities (or sexual minorities, for that matter) than governments that represent unfettered majority rule.
This has, of course, been a minor theme running through the mainstream press coverage of the flight of Eastern Christians from Iraq and other nations in that region. Every now and then, the mainstream press also notes the plight of the Bahai’s in Iran. Gays in Iran? Every now and then.
In other words, could there be a dark side to the Twitter and Facebook revolutions in Egypt, Libya and elsewhere?...
This year, I know, we will also pray for the safety of believers there. We will be praying for those that march in the streets once again, as they have marched for centuries, in the darkness that comes before dawn.
UPDATED: It appears that the government has, in effect, canceled Pascha, or a crucial part of it. Click here for the Washington Post story on this development.
"The great storm is coming, but the tide has turned." Culture, Catholicism, and current trends watched with a curious eye.
Tuesday, April 26, 2011
Persecuted, Indigenous Minority Blocked From Celebrating Holiday
That is, the Christians of the Middle East had one heck of a time with Easter. Why? Democratic revolutions almost never bode well for minorities--I know, counterintuitive, right? Majority rule can really suck for minorities--whoda thunk it? Excerpts follow:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment